JOIN WITH US

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Huge controversy caused by Kapil Sibal and his face off with Facebook

According to a report in the New York Times, Union Minister, Mr. Kapil Sibal met with leading social networking sites in an attempt to censor messages posted on them related to India. According to the report, Mr. Sibal called legal representatives from the top Internet service providers and Facebook into his New Delhi office... At the meeting, Mr. Sibal showed attendees a Facebook page that maligned the Congress Party’s president, Sonia Gandhi. “This is unacceptable,” he told attendees, and he asked them to find a way to monitor what is posted on their sites. The report goes on to say that he wanted these sites to be humanly monitored as opposed to using technology to filter out offensive comments!

The attempt to clamp down on personal freedom, while the government uses all its might to dig up dirt on its opponents, are troubling signs of those in power trying to exercise undue control. The good news is that the fear of social media has crept its way to the very top and an attempt to crush this could spell the eventual doom for those in power. Earlier this year, the Egyptians “turned off” the Internet in act of desperation and the world knows how that story ended. We might not have reached such a precipice as yet, but these are sure signs that those in power are determined to go to any lengths to crush the rising tide of discontent.

Freedom of expression has reached new highs as previously non-existent mediums are slowly becoming available to large sections of the world population. You can launch a song on the Internet and get millions of viewers and an ardent following in a matter of days, as we saw in the case of the Kolaveri song. Likewise, you can earn notoriety and be completely exposed, as in the case of Swami Agnivesh. If someone says things on the Internet about Sonia Gandhi, or far that matter anyone else, it doesn’t exactly become true. This is by no means an attempt to condone offensive messages. People who read such posts are likely to come to their own conclusions about individuals who post such messages. Posts on social networking sites are a part of person’s digital trail that is here to stay for posterity. Those who misuse these new forms of freedom on the Internet are bound to pay the price through a strange, almost “karmic,” self-regulating mechanism. So those who post frivolous messages are as much at risk as the people they chose to berate in public. Clamping down and playing “school principal” is just not going to work and in fact will only make things worse because people will always find a way to get around such roadblocks.

Part of the problem is that while the world has changed, our politics is stuck in a time warp. Political parties across the country are still, by and large, like extended family businesses with no semblance of intra-party democracy. While media channels have exploded, our political leadership operates like we are still in the age of Doordarshan. Our PM holds meetings behind closed doors with a handful of his veteran buddies from the media and calls it a “press conference.” Our prince-in-waiting, Mr. Rahul Gandhi, does not write or speak to the media. Unfortunately, neither does Ms. Sonia Gandhi. Between them, they wield enormous power but sadly, offer little insight into their world view or, for that matter, their vision for a country with a growing majority of bustling, impatient, and ambitious youngsters.

At a time when the country is faced with so many challenging problems, it is painful to see Mr. Sibal and his ilk focusing their energies on precisely the wrong things. For instance, security of our computer networks is for more critical than random comments on social networking sites. The move to police the web is an indication that our leaders are completely out of tune with the times and out of touch with its young and dynamic populace. The last few weeks, in particular, have clearly shown that our elected leaders from all parties are incapable of collectively addressing the most pressing issues facing the country. When there are critical bills to be discussed and passed, the government drags in changes related to FDI in retail without any prior discussion whatsoever on the issue. The opposition meanwhile, seems more intent on disruption rather than any substantive debate.

The future belongs to countries whose leaders are unafraid to embrace these new avenues of freedom enabled by the latest technologies -- leaders who view these mediums as a source of great strength and a means to tap into the collective wisdom of its people, rather than overreacting to the misuse by a relative minority. Clearly, “Young India” has taken to this medium in droves. They are hungry and eager for India to shed its slow and painstaking ways and surge ahead in a globalized world. To realize the dreams of these young men and women, those in power should either “shape up or ship out.”

-PRAN KURUP

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Why Mamata Needs to Grow Up

It’s six months after that sweltering summer day in May, when Mamata Banerjee became the first non-Left chief minister of Bengal in 35 years. Six months after her triumph, there are worrying signs that Mamata the chief minister might not live up to the potential of Didi who demolished the Left.

On the night of Saturday, November 5, Didi marched into a police station in Bhowanipore, south Kolkata, to order the release of a handful of her supporters from jail. These people were part of a mob which was playing very loud music and bursting crackers on the road in front of Kolkata’s main cancer hospital. When local police intervened to clear the road and stop the music, they were beaten. After a few troublemakers were locked up tensions escalated, with the chief minister’s brother picking up the cudgels on behalf of the goons. At least 12 policemen were injured in the scuffle. Finally Banerjee, who lives close by, turned up to tame the mob and set her rowdies free. The police filed no charges. Mamata’s supporters claim that she had to intervene because the incident occurred two days before Bakr Eid and urban development minister Firhad ‘Bobby’ Hakim, who Didi had sent to see what the ruckus what all about, suggested that it could take an ugly communal turn. Thus, it was inevitable that Didi would step in to rescue her goons. Really?

Has Mamata forgotten that she’s the chief minister of a state and the police are part of the establishment that she has to stabilize and run? By stepping into the fray on behalf of the goons, Banerjee eroded the credibility of the police. Her duty as chief minister is to enforce rule of law in Bengal, not strengthen the hands of goons. If Trinamool thugs can run amok with the blessings of the chief minister, civil society will be replaced by the rule of mobs. Mamata came to power deeply suspicious of the state and its various arms.

This fear was rational: after all the Left had permeated every nook and cranny of public life in Bengal, politicising the bureaucracy, police, teachers and even bus and auto drivers collectives. She put trusted people, many of them ex-babus and policemen who had joined her party and got elected, in key positions. But even that doesn’t seem to have eased her sense of insecurity: when a phone call to a senior cop would have sufficed, she chose to march to the thana in person.

The Trinamool doesn’t have spokesmen. Didi does most of the talking. And only Didi speaks on behalf of her government today. Asked recently about infant deaths in hospitals, Didi said she wasn’t doing health at that particular moment, she was doing industry. Mamata has inherited empty coffers. Her sole strategy to fill it is to ask New Delhi to write off Bengal’s debts, which totaled a staggering near-Rs 200,000 crore around the time of elections. And the number is speculative: few people, with the possible exception of finance minister Amit Mitra know how badly Bengal is broke.

A proper budget hasn’t been presented to the Assembly yet. All expenses are funded after votes on account. Mitra, a rookie politician who went from corporate lobbyist to the finance minister’s chair in Bengal, might not be fully aware himself. He should rope in his predecessor Asim Dasgupta, the Left’s economist-finance minister to unearth the real scale of Bengal’s bankruptcy. Even after a Central bailout takes place, Mamata might find it tough to live with its consequences. Belt tightening and higher taxes are prescribed for states in dire straits. But Didi doesn’t do taxes: she’s responded to fuel price hikes by cutting fuel taxes in Bengal. Everyone knew that reviving Bengal would be hard work. But it’ll be a tragedy if Mamata lets her quirks and caprices make a tough job even tougher.

- Abheek Barman



Friday, November 4, 2011

GJM is trying to blackmail the Government by trying to take ABAVP with it

Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee is unhappy with the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha (GJM) leadership for “trying to bite more territories in the Dooars than it should legitimately swallow”.

However, there was no official communication from the Chief Minister’s Office after Morcha chief Bimal Gurung struck a deal with Akhil Bharatiya Adivasi Vikas Parishad (ABAVP) leader John Burla.

Following the deal, Gurung dropped his demand for Gorkhaland Territorial Authority (GTA) — agreed upon in a tripartite movement signed by the Centre, State and GJM — and sought to replace it with a new arrangement called Gorkha Adivasi Territorial Authority (GATA), comprising all the 513 moujas of the Dooars.

In the earlier demand, the GJM had demanded 196 Gorkha-majority moujas and a high-powered team led by Justice Shyamal Sen was instituted to look into it.

However, Banerjee is unhappy because the new deal would stir a hornet’s nest in an already volatile area vexed by multiplicity of sub-national interests. Groups like Greater Cooch Behar People’s Association, Kamtapuri People’s Party and Madesias are already asking for their pounds of flesh.

“The GJM is trying to blackmail the Government by trying to take ABAVP with it,” said a Trinamool Minister.

If the Government allows this, the 29 per cent-plus Bengali population — a majority of which voted for the Trinamool — would be alienated from the party. “Didi would never concede to the demand and the GJM will have to look to work within what it had earlier demanded,” the Minister added.

While the GJM refused to comment on the issue, a party MLA said the Government would have to assuage feelings of the Gorkhas of the plains to get permanent peace in the region.

Meanwhile, John Burla rushed to Kolkata on Thursday to hold talks with ABAVP president Birsa Tirkey, who earlier rejected the new deal with the GJM and demoted the former from his post of a district president.

Tirkey said “Burla was not within his jurisdiction to sign any pact with any outfit while rejecting the deal” calling it “unacceptable and impractical agreement which has no basis.”

Tirkey conceded that the GATA agreement would obviously drive a wedge in the Adivasi organisation and finally help Gurung.




GJM is trying to blackmail the Government by trying to take ABAVP with it

Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee is unhappy with the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha (GJM) leadership for “trying to bite more territories in the Dooars than it should legitimately swallow”.

However, there was no official communication from the Chief Minister’s Office after Morcha chief Bimal Gurung struck a deal with Akhil Bharatiya Adivasi Vikas Parishad (ABAVP) leader John Burla.

Following the d...eal, Gurung dropped his demand for Gorkhaland Territorial Authority (GTA) — agreed upon in a tripartite movement signed by the Centre, State and GJM — and sought to replace it with a new arrangement called Gorkha Adivasi Territorial Authority (GATA), comprising all the 513 moujas of the Dooars.

In the earlier demand, the GJM had demanded 196 Gorkha-majority moujas and a high-powered team led by Justice Shyamal Sen was instituted to look into it.

However, Banerjee is unhappy because the new deal would stir a hornet’s nest in an already volatile area vexed by multiplicity of sub-national interests. Groups like Greater Cooch Behar People’s Association, Kamtapuri People’s Party and Madesias are already asking for their pounds of flesh.

“The GJM is trying to blackmail the Government by trying to take ABAVP with it,” said a Trinamool Minister.

If the Government allows this, the 29 per cent-plus Bengali population — a majority of which voted for the Trinamool — would be alienated from the party. “Didi would never concede to the demand and the GJM will have to look to work within what it had earlier demanded,” the Minister added.

While the GJM refused to comment on the issue, a party MLA said the Government would have to assuage feelings of the Gorkhas of the plains to get permanent peace in the region.

Meanwhile, John Burla rushed to Kolkata on Thursday to hold talks with ABAVP president Birsa Tirkey, who earlier rejected the new deal with the GJM and demoted the former from his post of a district president.

Tirkey said “Burla was not within his jurisdiction to sign any pact with any outfit while rejecting the deal” calling it “unacceptable and impractical agreement which has no basis.”

Tirkey conceded that the GATA agreement would obviously drive a wedge in the Adivasi organisation and finally help Gurung.



Courtsey : The PIONEER

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Mamata brokered territory deal: CPM, CM and Deb to come clean on GTA DEAL

Siliguri, Nov. 1: The CPM today alleged that the deal between the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha and the Akhil Bharatiya Adivasi Vikas Parishad on territory had been brokered by minister Gautam Deb with the blessings of Mamata Banerjee.

Former minister and CPM leader Asok Bhattacharya asked the chief minister to come clean about her government’s stand on the inclusion of the Dooars and the Terai in the Gorkhaland Territorial Administration.

“The chief minister had time and again claimed that her government had resolved the Darjeeling hill issue with the GTA agreement. She should take responsibility for the new situation arising from the Parishad’s consent to the transfer of the Terai and the Dooars to the GTA. The government should say loud and clear if its wants the two regions to be brought under the ambit of the GTA,” said Bhattacharya.

The Parishad’s units in the Dooars and the Terai had announced on Sunday that they were backing the inclusion of the regions in the GTA. Earlier, the Parishad had been opposing tooth and nail the Morcha’s claim to 199 mouzas in the plains and there were frequent skirmishes between the supporters of both the outfits.

The CPM leader said the silence maintained by Mamata and north Bengal development minister Deb raised suspicion that both were privy to the parleys between the Parishad and the Morcha.

Asok Bhattacharya  :

“Mamata’s silence and her cabinet colleagues’ refusal to speak on the deal make us suspect the entire development has taken place with her knowledge. We strongly feel that Mamata Banerjee had prior information on the Parishad-Morcha tie-up and Gautam Deb played the role of interlocutor in the parleys between the two sides. In fact, Deb had met leaders of the Parishad and the Morcha many times,” said Bhattacharya.

“(Morcha president) Bimal Gurung’s confidence during the joint news conference with Parishad leaders on Sunday that they would achieve the goal (inclusion of the Terai and the Dooars in the GTA) also strengthens our suspicions,” he added.

Deb refused comment yesterday when The Telegraph asked him about the deal between the hill and the tribal outfits.

Bhattacharya said he feared that the tie-up between the Morcha and the Parishad would embolden other outfits seeking statehood to up their ante.

“The deal will have ramification for the entire north Bengal and an uncertainty looms over the formation of the GTA now.”

Deb was reticent about the deal today too. “We have not received any formal proposal and it is not possible for me to make comments based on media reports. Nonetheless, the government wants to make it very clear that it is sincere in maintaining the integrity of north Bengal,” he said.

Told about Bhattacharya’s charges, Deb said: “He is making desperate attempts to grab media attention. I would prefer to ignore such statements.”

Courtsey : The Telegraph


Monday, October 31, 2011

VOICE OF THE PEOPLE : "ABVP’s change in stand would create fresh tension in the region".




QUOTES :


"ABVP’s change in stand would create fresh tension in the region".


-Salil Acharya, CPM, district secretariat member


"Under no circumstances should the plains be brought under the ambit of the GTA".


-Ziaur Alam, CPM district secretariat member, Jalpaiguri


“I have my doubts about the unity of the Parishad because of the internal bickering in the outfit. I feel the state government should take care of tribal rights to land and other things and allow development to take place in the Terai and the Dooars,”


-D.P.Roy, MLA, Alipurduar

“Many people are opposed to the Parishad’s move. The government has created a rift between the people of the region.”

- Atul Roy, the president of the Kamtapur Progressive Party


“We oppose any steps that will affect the interest of the Rajbanshis. Thousands of Rajbanshis live in the Dooars. We will decide on a movement demanding that our problems be addressed immediately.”

-Asutosh Burma, The Greater Cooch Behar Democratic Party

The decision has been taken very hastily. This involves the sentiment of thousands of common people of all communities. We must not forget that ABAVP also enjoys the support of other non-Nepalese and non-tribal communities as well. If they are not happy with us, how can we move further?


- Tea Labourer, Odlabari Tea Estate
SOURCE: Times of India

"We supported the ABAVP as it had promised to resist the GJM in the plains. Now once they have joined hands with the GJM, it will be easier for them to penetrate this region. It is obvious that the GJM will start calling the shots in this region. Who will guarantee that they won't target us once their goal is achieved?

- Tea Labourer, Odlabari Tea Estate

"The decision has been taken very hastily. This involves the sentiment of thousands of common people of all communities. We must not forget that ABAVP also enjoys the support of other non-Nepalese and non-tribal communities as well. If they are not happy with us, how can we move further?

This is not an official decision of the party. A faction of our organisation has agreed to joint GATA. But we are not ready. It is a political conspiracy hatched by Bimal Gurung and Roshan Giri to capture tribal land in Terai and Dooars."


-BIRSA TIRKEY, PRESIDENT, ABAVP, Paschim Banga
SOURCE: Times of India

Government is “displeased” with the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha’s “efforts to strike a deal” with local leaders of the Akhil Bharatiya Adivasi Vikas Parishad


Oct. 31: The state government is “displeased” with the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha’s “efforts to strike a deal” with local leaders of the Akhil Bharatiya Adivasi Vikas Parishad to press for the inclusion of the entire Dooars-Terai region within the hill set-up, sources said.

By roping in the Parishad, the Morcha is trying to put pressure on the committee formed to look into the territory issue of the Gorkhaland Territorial Administration (GTA) to include more plains areas in the hill set-up, the government sources said.

Such a move could “alienate the people of the plains from the Trinamul Congress”, the sources added.

“The chief minister is displeased with the Morcha for trying to strike a deal with the Parishad. The outfits now want all the 514 mouzas in the Dooars-Terai region to be included in the GTA. Earlier, the Morcha had demanded the inclusion of 196 mouzas from the plains in the set-up. The Justice (retd) Shyamal Sen-headed committee is looking into the earlier demand,” a Writers’ source said.

The sources said Mamata Banerjee was “against the inclusion of more plains areas in the GTA than what the committee is already looking into”.

“By roping in the tribals, the Morcha is planning to press for the inclusion of more plains areas in the GTA. The Parishad’s support will increase the Morcha’s bargaining power. This will alienate the non-hill population from Trinamul and strengthen the CPM’s claim that the Mamata government is trying to divide Bengal,” one of the sources said.

The Parishad, which had earlier opposed the inclusion of the Dooars and the Terai in the hill set-up, held a joint news conference in Mongpong, 25km from Siliguri, yesterday and said it had agreed to the plains areas being included in the GTA.

The Parishad leaders had said the Morcha had accepted their condition of including “Adivasi” in the name of the Gorkhaland Territorial Administration (GTA).

“If the Parishad joins the GTA and starts demanding a separate Gorkha Adivasi Pradesh together with the Morcha, we could be in an awkward situation. The chief minister will not allow separate statehood under any circumstance,” a Trinamul leader said.

Sources in the cabinet said the government was “surprised” at the new development and was monitoring the situation “cautiously” before deciding on its course of action.

“We were surprised to say the least. We were not prepared, especially after the enactment of the GTA, for such a move,” a minister said.

North Bengal affairs minister Gautam Deb refused comment, merely saying: “We have not received any official communication, verbally or in writing, yet. I’m not going to comment on the issue on the basis of what has appeared in newspapers.”

CPM leader Surjya Kanta Mishra today said the Morcha was trying to “create a divide between the tribals” by demanding with a section of Parishad the inclusion of the entire Dooars-Terai region in the GTA. “Fresh complications are being created by the Morcha. The majority of the Adivasis don’t want the region to be part of the GTA.”


Source : The Telegraph