JOIN WITH US

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Huge controversy caused by Kapil Sibal and his face off with Facebook

According to a report in the New York Times, Union Minister, Mr. Kapil Sibal met with leading social networking sites in an attempt to censor messages posted on them related to India. According to the report, Mr. Sibal called legal representatives from the top Internet service providers and Facebook into his New Delhi office... At the meeting, Mr. Sibal showed attendees a Facebook page that maligned the Congress Party’s president, Sonia Gandhi. “This is unacceptable,” he told attendees, and he asked them to find a way to monitor what is posted on their sites. The report goes on to say that he wanted these sites to be humanly monitored as opposed to using technology to filter out offensive comments!

The attempt to clamp down on personal freedom, while the government uses all its might to dig up dirt on its opponents, are troubling signs of those in power trying to exercise undue control. The good news is that the fear of social media has crept its way to the very top and an attempt to crush this could spell the eventual doom for those in power. Earlier this year, the Egyptians “turned off” the Internet in act of desperation and the world knows how that story ended. We might not have reached such a precipice as yet, but these are sure signs that those in power are determined to go to any lengths to crush the rising tide of discontent.

Freedom of expression has reached new highs as previously non-existent mediums are slowly becoming available to large sections of the world population. You can launch a song on the Internet and get millions of viewers and an ardent following in a matter of days, as we saw in the case of the Kolaveri song. Likewise, you can earn notoriety and be completely exposed, as in the case of Swami Agnivesh. If someone says things on the Internet about Sonia Gandhi, or far that matter anyone else, it doesn’t exactly become true. This is by no means an attempt to condone offensive messages. People who read such posts are likely to come to their own conclusions about individuals who post such messages. Posts on social networking sites are a part of person’s digital trail that is here to stay for posterity. Those who misuse these new forms of freedom on the Internet are bound to pay the price through a strange, almost “karmic,” self-regulating mechanism. So those who post frivolous messages are as much at risk as the people they chose to berate in public. Clamping down and playing “school principal” is just not going to work and in fact will only make things worse because people will always find a way to get around such roadblocks.

Part of the problem is that while the world has changed, our politics is stuck in a time warp. Political parties across the country are still, by and large, like extended family businesses with no semblance of intra-party democracy. While media channels have exploded, our political leadership operates like we are still in the age of Doordarshan. Our PM holds meetings behind closed doors with a handful of his veteran buddies from the media and calls it a “press conference.” Our prince-in-waiting, Mr. Rahul Gandhi, does not write or speak to the media. Unfortunately, neither does Ms. Sonia Gandhi. Between them, they wield enormous power but sadly, offer little insight into their world view or, for that matter, their vision for a country with a growing majority of bustling, impatient, and ambitious youngsters.

At a time when the country is faced with so many challenging problems, it is painful to see Mr. Sibal and his ilk focusing their energies on precisely the wrong things. For instance, security of our computer networks is for more critical than random comments on social networking sites. The move to police the web is an indication that our leaders are completely out of tune with the times and out of touch with its young and dynamic populace. The last few weeks, in particular, have clearly shown that our elected leaders from all parties are incapable of collectively addressing the most pressing issues facing the country. When there are critical bills to be discussed and passed, the government drags in changes related to FDI in retail without any prior discussion whatsoever on the issue. The opposition meanwhile, seems more intent on disruption rather than any substantive debate.

The future belongs to countries whose leaders are unafraid to embrace these new avenues of freedom enabled by the latest technologies -- leaders who view these mediums as a source of great strength and a means to tap into the collective wisdom of its people, rather than overreacting to the misuse by a relative minority. Clearly, “Young India” has taken to this medium in droves. They are hungry and eager for India to shed its slow and painstaking ways and surge ahead in a globalized world. To realize the dreams of these young men and women, those in power should either “shape up or ship out.”

-PRAN KURUP

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Why Mamata Needs to Grow Up

It’s six months after that sweltering summer day in May, when Mamata Banerjee became the first non-Left chief minister of Bengal in 35 years. Six months after her triumph, there are worrying signs that Mamata the chief minister might not live up to the potential of Didi who demolished the Left.

On the night of Saturday, November 5, Didi marched into a police station in Bhowanipore, south Kolkata, to order the release of a handful of her supporters from jail. These people were part of a mob which was playing very loud music and bursting crackers on the road in front of Kolkata’s main cancer hospital. When local police intervened to clear the road and stop the music, they were beaten. After a few troublemakers were locked up tensions escalated, with the chief minister’s brother picking up the cudgels on behalf of the goons. At least 12 policemen were injured in the scuffle. Finally Banerjee, who lives close by, turned up to tame the mob and set her rowdies free. The police filed no charges. Mamata’s supporters claim that she had to intervene because the incident occurred two days before Bakr Eid and urban development minister Firhad ‘Bobby’ Hakim, who Didi had sent to see what the ruckus what all about, suggested that it could take an ugly communal turn. Thus, it was inevitable that Didi would step in to rescue her goons. Really?

Has Mamata forgotten that she’s the chief minister of a state and the police are part of the establishment that she has to stabilize and run? By stepping into the fray on behalf of the goons, Banerjee eroded the credibility of the police. Her duty as chief minister is to enforce rule of law in Bengal, not strengthen the hands of goons. If Trinamool thugs can run amok with the blessings of the chief minister, civil society will be replaced by the rule of mobs. Mamata came to power deeply suspicious of the state and its various arms.

This fear was rational: after all the Left had permeated every nook and cranny of public life in Bengal, politicising the bureaucracy, police, teachers and even bus and auto drivers collectives. She put trusted people, many of them ex-babus and policemen who had joined her party and got elected, in key positions. But even that doesn’t seem to have eased her sense of insecurity: when a phone call to a senior cop would have sufficed, she chose to march to the thana in person.

The Trinamool doesn’t have spokesmen. Didi does most of the talking. And only Didi speaks on behalf of her government today. Asked recently about infant deaths in hospitals, Didi said she wasn’t doing health at that particular moment, she was doing industry. Mamata has inherited empty coffers. Her sole strategy to fill it is to ask New Delhi to write off Bengal’s debts, which totaled a staggering near-Rs 200,000 crore around the time of elections. And the number is speculative: few people, with the possible exception of finance minister Amit Mitra know how badly Bengal is broke.

A proper budget hasn’t been presented to the Assembly yet. All expenses are funded after votes on account. Mitra, a rookie politician who went from corporate lobbyist to the finance minister’s chair in Bengal, might not be fully aware himself. He should rope in his predecessor Asim Dasgupta, the Left’s economist-finance minister to unearth the real scale of Bengal’s bankruptcy. Even after a Central bailout takes place, Mamata might find it tough to live with its consequences. Belt tightening and higher taxes are prescribed for states in dire straits. But Didi doesn’t do taxes: she’s responded to fuel price hikes by cutting fuel taxes in Bengal. Everyone knew that reviving Bengal would be hard work. But it’ll be a tragedy if Mamata lets her quirks and caprices make a tough job even tougher.

- Abheek Barman